Following from my presentation at the National Digital Forum 2023 conference I noticed many people taking fotos of my challenges slides, so I thought I’d reproduce them here, using the How might we? way of thinking about these.
I also didn’t get to talk about suggestions from audiences I have consulted over the years as to how GLAM could address big issues, but you can find them here.
Challenges: worries and big issues
- Big issues focus around climate, conflict, climate, gender, climate, mental health, climate
- Gurian (1995): Museums as “safe places for unsafe ideas”
- How might GLAM offer programs around ending racism, reducing climate change, equality and alleviating poverty?
- How might GLAM navigate the tricky issues around current global conflicts?
- How might GLAM reach out to younger audiences who are interested in the world but not necessarily looking to GLAM for answers?
- How are we looking after staff, volunteers, audiences affected by distressing world events?
Challenges: Barriers to participation
- Financial pressures / cost of living #1 pressure for audiences, business and GLAM
- GLAM (museums) perceived as ‘look but don’t touch’:
- Yet also as inspiring places of wonder
- As a sector, how might we use our strength of numbers in advocacy to provide affordable experiences for audiences?
- What might we do about the increased casualised workforce and staffing pressures?
- How might we change perceptions from ‘look, don’t touch’ to GLAM as places of stimulating and challenging learning for all abilities?
Challenges: Digital
- Audiences are tired of screens:
- Yet they are very interested in immersive experiences
- Audiences don’t understand and are worried about emerging technologies such as AI
- Many (many) GLAM organisations don’t have the time, energy and resources to dedicate to thinking about digital programming:
- They are too busy sorting out problems such as CRMs, ticketing systems and project management
- COVID reinforced the pressure digital teams, specifically social media, are under
- How might we provide onsite digital experiences for tired eyes?
- How might we use technology to allay fears about AI taking over the world and our jobs (for example)?
- How might we allocate resources across new priority areas – online vs onsite??
- How are we looking after health and wellbeing of digital (and other) staff?
Challenges: Trust and information
- Adults generally trust museums (GLAM)
- Audiences are distrustful of media and skeptical about information online
- Teenagers and young people use TikTok as information sources, for skills development and for event planning:
- And, TikTok is banned by many government agencies
- There has been a decline in attention spans:
- 12 seconds in 2000 to 8 seconds in 2020
- The average attention span of goldfish is 9 seconds…
- How might we capitalise on the ‘goodwill’ (and some affection) for GLAM?
- How might we use digital platforms more effectively within constraints?
- How might we address the issue of reaching audiences with limited time and attention spans – both in marketing and in programming?
Challenges: Education and learning
- GLAM organisations are seen as places for learning and education
- Hybrid learning (and working) is here to stay:
- Many students love it
- Unstable state of museum education:
- Unintended consequences of losing educational audiences who are often the mainstay for numbers and revenue
- How can we be seen as learning institutions when we don’t (necessarily) value staff that deliver these programs?
- How might we shift our programming to meet the needs of audiences who prefer online learning, and those who want both?
- How might we accommodate new ways of working while still delivering onsite experiences and opening the doors?
Thanks to those who came to my presentation – much appreciated.
Kia ora Lynda, thank you for your insightful comments and notes from what looks like a great NDF. Nga mihi Pamela Lovis
Thnx for that lovely feedback Pamela. It was a terrific event and I’m hoping to be back next year!